Alternative Driver Ct4780 Windows 7

Accidents at work: the first sanctions "231"

in the post I am attaching an article in the Sun 24 Hours this week (Thursday 10/12) which shows the first conviction for an accident at work which have been fully subject to the penalties provided for by Legislative Decree no. 231/2001 (almost up to 1.5 million € for FS and about half a million euro for smaller companies that were contracted out the cleaning of the tanks). The interesting fact of the sentence is not only related to the construction of a specific case law on it (is the first case on the subject) but also condemned the apparent contradiction in having a large company like FS that had, at least formally adopted a SGSL. The adoption of the system, therefore, was not considered as extenuating circumstance responsibilities under the Decree. 231/2001, despite the signs article. 30 of the MLR. It will be interesting to assess the rationale of the court to understand how the formal adoption of both "soft" legal obligation towards you if you do not have concrete evidence of its effectiveness. In summary, while the incident was widely expected (as it appears from the evidence) the system was not considered effectively implemented, despite the amount of paper produced surely. I can only express my satisfaction if that is the principle that it will consolidate in-law. Unlike ISO 9000, in fact, in the case of security since nothing can be done in formal relation to a life broken. I await your comments. (DV).

>>> article "Il Sole 24 Ore" on Judgement "231" \u0026lt;\u0026lt;\u0026lt;